Effects of using Different Reconstruction Algorithms on Coronary Motion Artifacts at Various Heart Rates during Coronary CT Angiography-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effects of using Different Reconstruction Algorithms on Coronary Motion Artifacts at Various Heart Rates during Coronary CT Angiography

Published:2019 Issue:4 Volume:25 Page:90-97
ISSN:2434-2173
Container-title:Journal of Coronary Artery Disease
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Fukui Rika¹,Yamamoto Yuzo¹,Tanigaki Koji¹,Suzuki Shigeru¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East

Publisher

The Japanese Coronary Association

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcad/25/4/25_25.19-00013/_pdf

Reference34 articles.

1. 1) Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al: American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology: Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography; a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006; 114: 1761–1791

2. 2) Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al: Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2324–2336

3. 3) Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al: Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241: 378–385

4. 4) Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al: Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006; 238: 75–86

5. 5) Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al: Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005; 234: 86–97