Does Intravascular Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improve Clinical Outcomes?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Does Intravascular Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Published:2023 Issue:2 Volume:29 Page:26-32
ISSN:2434-2173
Container-title:Journal of Coronary Artery Disease
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Yamamoto Ko¹,Kimura Takeshi²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital

2. Department of Cardiology, Hirakata Kohsai Hospital

Publisher

The Japanese Coronary Association

Subject

Automotive Engineering

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcad/29/2/29_29.001/_pdf

Reference40 articles.

1. 1) Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group: Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3281–3300

2. 2) Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al: Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995; 91: 1676–1688

3. 3) Smilowitz NR, Mohananey D, Razzouk L, et al: Impact and trends of intravascular imaging in diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in inpatients in the United States. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 92: E410–E415

4. 4) Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Spertus JA, et al: Comparative trends in percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 1328–1340

5. 5) Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M, et al: Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 578–583