Author:
Finkelstein Israel,Piasetzky Eli
Abstract
This article discusses methodological issues related to the radiocarbon dating of Khirbet Qeiyafa, mainly the question of whether the site should be dated solely according to samples retrieved there or dated as part of a regional sequence of stratigraphically based ceramic typology phases. For the latter, we deploy the large number of 14C determinations now available for several sites in the Shephelah, which are located in close proximity to each other, in order to establish a Bayesian model for the absolute chronology of the Iron I–IIA phases in the region. We argue that the information assembled from six neighboring sites in the Shephelah pushes forward the date of Qeiyafa to the 10th century, a date later than the one the excavators estimated based on the more limited 14C information from the site alone.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Archeology
Reference53 articles.
1. IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP
2. Has King David's Palace in Jerusalem been Found?
3. The contribution of Khirbet Qeiyafa to our understanding of the Iron Age period;Garfinkel;Strata, Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society,2010
4. Khirbet Qeiyafa: late Iron I in spite of it all;Singer-Avitz;Israel Exploration Journal,2012
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献