Abstract
The Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control strategy is very simple, robust, and sufficient to tune the low-order plus time delay model. On the other hand, the empirical PID controller has structural limitations in controlling the unstable processes. The closed-loop dynamics and structural mismatch can be analyzed intuitively to understand why the PID controller is not suitable to control the unstable processes effectively. Also, the conventional PID controller with minor structural variations designed to guarantee Optimal Gain Margin (OGM) tuning and Integral of the Time-weighted Absolute Error (ITAE) tuning, handles better than the performance offered by a conventional PID controller for an unstable process.
Publisher
Inventive Research Organization
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference10 articles.
1. [1] Saxena Nikita & M.Chidambaram, “Improved Relay autotuning of PID Controllers for unstable SOPTD system”, Chemical engineering and communication. Vol:203,Issue:6,Pages:769-782,2016.
2. [2] Ziegler, J.G. and Nichols, N.B. (1942) Optimum setting for automatic controllers, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 64, 759.
3. [3] Lopez, A.M., Miller, C.L., Smith, C.L. and Murrill, P.W. (1967) Controller tuning relationships based on integral performance criteria, Instrumentation Technology, 14 (12), 72.
4. [4] Morari, M. and Zafiriou, E. (1989) Robust Process Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
5. [5] Sung, S.W. and Lee, I. (1996) Limitations and countermeasures of PID controllers. Industrial&Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 2596.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献