Abstract
The essence of the concept of "moral culture" is multifaceted and multidimensional, multifaceted and internally different. It includes the moral principles, norms, categories, ideals learned and accepted by the individual and at the same time expresses her appropriate attitude to herself, to other people, to future pedagogical activities. The formation of moral culture among the youth of Ukraine is very important to focus on foreign countries, to actualize the issue is strengthened by the integration of Ukraine into the European educational space. The article describes different points of view of researchers and analysis of methods used in foreign countries to form the moral culture of a student's personality. In England, during the formation of moral culture among young people, emphasis is placed on the need for interpersonal relationships, the need for activity or creativity, the need for self-affirmation, and the need for an orientation system. Having researched sixteen universities in the USA, scientist S.V. Fedorenko singled out the following common features: educational courses in civics, courses in ethical and moral direction, educational courses in the study of cultural diversity. In France, during the entire educational process from primary school to university, learning is accompanied by the development of artistic and aesthetic education in accordance with age. In Germany, they believe that society, and first of all teachers, should consider it their duty to improve the inner world of a person, to fill it with a thirst for freedom, a craving for beauty, goodness, a desire for humanity and an awareness of one's place in it.
Publisher
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Reference9 articles.
1. Vashchenko, H. (1994) Vykhovnyi ideal [Educational ideal]. Poltava, 192.
2. Volynets, L. (2009) Tendentsii rozvytku zahalnoi mystetskoi osvity v krainakh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Trends in the development of general art education in the countries of the European Union]. Porivnialno-pedahohichni studii. № 2, 36–47.
3. Yonas, H. (2001) Pryntsyp vidpovidalnosti. U poshukakh etyky dlia tekhnolohichnoi tsyvilizatsii [Принцип відповідальності. У пошуках етики для технологічної цивілізації.]. K.: Libra, 400.
4. Poltavets, V. (2005) Innovatsiini proekty mystetsko-kulturnykh prohram u shkolakh Frantsii [Innovative projects of artistic and cultural programs in French schools]. Mystetstvo ta osvita: nauk.-metod. zhurn. № 1 (35), 20–22.
5. Psykholohyia y uchytel [Psychology and teacher]. M.: «Sovershenstvo», 1997, 320.