New ethics as a reaction to globalization

Author:

Suprun A.

Abstract

Topicality. In the modern geopolitical space, the most urgent issue is the national security of individual states in the conditions of various forms of geopolitical expansion. Ukraine is at the epicenter of these extremely difficult conditions. The national security of our country is under threat. Socio-political forecasts and globalization processes point to the reformatting of the consciousness not only of an individual nation, but also of the entire world society. The cultures of the peoples of the entire planet Earth are under the powerful influence of globalization processes. The purpose of the article is to analyze the expected and unexpected changes that we will receive as a result of this large-scale and multifaceted process. especially the emergence of new ethics as a reaction to globalization. Therefore, the main tasks are to determine the possible interpretations of globalization processes in the conditions of geopolitical expansion, the main manipulative components: politics, economy, mass culture, mass media; analysis of consequential phenomena, such as: deformed consciousness of individuals and society as a whole, crisis of self-understanding in the globalized world, risks of loss of identity. As a result of the research, it was found that we associate the emergence of new narratives, norms, and prescriptions with the emergence of new ethics, which will become the main regulator within the limits of civilized globalization. As a conclusion, it can be argued that the most important problem remains the place of man and his relationships in the world of total globalization.

Publisher

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Reference8 articles.

1. Atkinson A. (2002). Globalisation and the European welfare state at the opening and the closing of the twentieth century. H. Kierzkowski (Ed.). Europe and Globalisation. New York: Palgrave‐MacMillan, 249‒273.

2. Berger S. (2002). Globalisation and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 43‒62.

3. Bergh A., Nilsson T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalisation increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 488‒505.

4. Litvinova I., Ivanov A., Suprun A., Nitchenko A., Stets O. (2021). Impact of the pandemic on the personal freedom limitation (personal freedom includes freedom of mobility). Ad Alta-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11(2), 40–44.

5. Neal G. A. (1998). National Trauma and Collective Memory: Major Events in the American Century. New York, London: M. E. Sharpe, 224.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The theoretical path of constructive journalism and practical experience in China;Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias;2024-09-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3