ART OF THINKING LOGICALLY AND PECULIARITIES OF PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTATION-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

ART OF THINKING LOGICALLY AND PECULIARITIES OF PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTATION

Published:2021 Issue:1 Volume:12 Page:112-118
ISSN:2706-9222
Container-title:HUMANITARIAN STUDIOS: PEDAGOGICS, PSYCHOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY
language:
Short-container-title:HUMANITARIAN STUDIOS: PEDAGOGICS, PSYCHOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY

Author:

Matviienko I.,

Abstract

Argumentation, as an assemblage of proofs in defense of the stated positions is always present in philosophical dispute, and the extent to which you are conclusive in this dispute depends on your skills of argumentation. That is why this article is devoted to the examination of philosophical argumentation and its use of formal logics.

Publisher

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Subject

Materials Chemistry

Reference8 articles.

1. 1. Kozlova M. S. (2005) «Chudo» etycheskoho vzghliada Vythenshteina (Wittgenstein's "Miracle" of the Ethical View). Chelovek. № 5.[ In Russian]

2. 2. Kornylova H. Y., Lantsova Y. V. (2012) «Zhyv chelovek ne lohykoi edynoi» yly k voprosu o spetsyfyke fylosofskoi arhumentatsyy ("Man does not live by logic alone," or on the specificity of philosophical argumentation) // VESTNYK YrHTU «Humanytarnыe nauky», № 1 (60). s. 249-254. [In Russian]

3. 3. Lohika: Navchalnyi posibnyk (Logic: Textbook) (2020) / S. V. Storozhuk, I. M. Hoian, I. S. Matviienko. Kyiv: Vadeks. 370 s. [In Ukrainian]

4. 4. Lukasevych Ya. (1999) O determynyzme (About Determinism) // Fylosofyia y lohyka Lvovsko-Varshavskoi shkoli. [In Russian]

5. 5. Matviienko I. S. (2020). Teoriia arhumentatsii: formalna contra neformalna lohika (Theory of argumentation: formal versus informal logic)// Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 1(1), s. 98-107. [In Ukrainian]