Abstract
The work examines modern names, which are included in the term system as
an organized lexical mass, and are used in other subject areas for the purpose of language economy. The
author tries to distinguish between deterrminologization and a family of new terms, which appeared at the
beginning of the third millennium in connection with the spread of coronovirus disease, as well as the
Russian-Ukrainian war. The goal of the research is to analyze the peculiarities of functioning in the scientific
community of some new terminological units that have appeared in our society, caused by the appearance of
Kovydou and the unsupported aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Methods. The work
uses a structural-typological approach to the language univercities in a synchronous and diachronic
perspective, which is conditioned by the communicative discourse and is tested at the lexical level.
Discussion. The innovations that appear in the vocabulary are the result of nominatio n, due to which
the language units and the objects they signify are related. Also, there are some non-linguistic phenomena
that are mirrored in current realities. The term Convid-19 at extraordinary speed became a part of the
scientific community, was integrated into modern languages, underwent graphical adaptation, and took
"forgotten" terms with it. The article reveals the peculiarities of the spread of neoterms, which are popularized
by means of modern media, as well as due to the development of new technologies. The author tries to
demonstrate how terms and nonterms are separated, whether there are some interfaces between the
function of terms and general national vocabulary, and whether the term is de-terminologized.
Conclusions. The increase in the number of terminological units and, accordingly, the volume of new
terminologies, which serve them, is the result of so-called scientific revolutions, The new terminologies they
serve are the result of the so-called scientific revolutions, which are carried out under the mighty influence of
the factual research, which requires elaboration by means of the lexicon of the general national language.
Publisher
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference21 articles.
1. «Omikron» v Ukraini pidtverdzhuiut u kozhnoho piatoho khvoroho [«Omicron» in Ukraine is confirmed in every one of every one of the patients]. (2022). Slovo i Dilo. Analitychnyi portal [Word & Deed. Analytical Portal]. URL: https://www.slovoidilo.ua/2022/ 02/07/novyna/suspilstvo/omikronom-xvoriye-kozhen-pyatyj-ukrayinecz-kuzin
2. Vakulyk, I. I. (2015). Linhvistychni aspekty naukovoi komunikatsii u synkhronii ta diakhronii [Linguistic aspects of scientific communication in synchrony and diachronic]. Kyiv. 280.
3. Golovin, B. N. & Kobrin, R. Yu. (1987). Lingvisticheskie osnovy ucheniya o terminah [Linguistic Foundations of the Doctrine of Terms]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 105.
4. Danilenko, V. P. (2010). Nauchnaya kartina mira [Scientific picture of the world]. Osnovy duhovnoj kul'tury v kartinah mira [Fundamentals of spiritual culture in pictures of the world]. URL: http://slovo.isu.ru/ danilenko/articles/nauchnkart.htm
5. Dynamichni protsesy v suchasnomu ukrainskomu leksykoni (2008): Monohrafiia [Dynamic Processes in the Modern Ukrainian Lexicon: Monograph]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi Dim Dmytra Buraho. 336. URL: http://surl.li/bieri