Author:
Samal Badhuli,Padekar Hira,Dash Lona,Shastri Jayanthi
Abstract
Clindamycin is an excellent drug for skin and soft tissue Staphylococcus aureus infections, but resistance mediated by inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (iMLS)phenotype leads to in vivo therapeutic failure even though they may be in vitro susceptible in Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method (KBDDM). Hence the study was undertaken to detect the prevalence of iMLS phenotype among Staphylococcus aureus isolates by double disk approximation test (D-test) in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 100 consecutive Staphylococcus species isolates were identified by standard microbiological methods and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by KBDDM. Clindamycin-resistance either in the form of iMLSB or cMLSB was determined through double disk diffusion method or D-test by using erythromycin (2 μg) and clindamycin (15μg) as per the CLSI guidelines. Out of 100 Staphylococcus species studied, 50(50%) were methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 30(30%) were Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 20 (20%) were Coagulase negative Staphylococci. Out of 80 Staphylococcus aureus studied, iMLSB, cMLSB and MS phenotype were 32.5%, 1.25%, 5% respectively. Inducible resistance and MS phenotype were found to be higher in MRSA as compared to MSSA (60%, 6.66% and 16%, 4% respectively). The study revealed 32.5% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates were inducible clindamycin resistant, which could be easily misidentified as clindamycin susceptible in Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method. Therefore, clinical microbiology laboratory should routinely perform D-test in all clinically isolated Staphylococcus aureus to guide clinicians for the appropriate use of clindamycin.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference14 articles.
1. Fiebelkorn K. R., Crawford S. A., McElmeel M. L., Jorgensen J. H., Practical Disk Diffusion Method for Detection of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.J Clin Microbiol 2003;41(10):4740-4
2. Gadepalli R, Dhawan B, Mohanty S, Kapil A, Das B K, Chaudhry R, Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.Indian J Med Res 2006;123:571-3
3. Leclercq R, Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications.Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:482-92
4. Siberry G. K., Tekle T., Carroll K., Dick J., Failure of Clindamycin Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Expressing Inducible Clindamycin Resistance In Vitro.Clin Infect Dis 2003;37(9):1257-60
5. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Seventeenth Informational Suppl 2017;27(1):
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献