Affiliation:
1. Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India
2. V
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to correlate the accuracy of Roods and Shehab signs in an intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPAR) with Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings to indicate Cone-beam computed tomography only in high-risk conditions.70 impacted mandibular third molar teeth in 58 patients above 18 years with intraoral periapical radiographs presenting with one or more root and canal signs of Rood and Shehab criteria were included in the study. Winter's classification was recorded, and the patients were exposed to a Cone-beam computed tomographic scan. True canal – tooth relationship was assessed in the sectional images. Pearson Chi-square test was used to correlate periapical radiograph and tomographic findings, and an unpaired t-test was applied for descriptive analysis.Rood and Shehab canal criteria in the periapical radiographs were significantly correlated to direct contact of an impacted lower third molar with the canal (p< 0.05) and loss of cortication of Mandibular canal (p< 0.05) on the cone-beam computed tomography. Cone-beam computed tomography is recommended to assess the periapical radiographs with canal risk markers pre-operatively to help avoid iatrogenic complications.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Reference18 articles.
1. Malik NA, .Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery.
2. Nagaraj M, Chitre AP, Mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar canal.J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2009;8:233-6
3. Hupp JR, Tucker MR, Ellis E, .Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery.
4. Rivera-Herrera R S, Esparza-Villalpando V, Bermeo-Escalona J R, Martínez-Rider R, Pozos-Guillén A, .Agreement analysis of three mandibular third molar retention classifications. Gaceta medica de Mexico 2020;156:22-28
5. Bouloux G F, Steed M B, Perciaccante V J, .Complications of third molar surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics 2007;19:117-145