Comparative study on incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) between conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)

Author:

Chaitanya S Ravi1,Ravindran Meenakshi2,Venugopal Anitha

Affiliation:

1. Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu India

2. T

Abstract

To compare incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in patients after microkeratome and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using ultrasound B-scan. Prospective, non-randomised, comparative and interventional hospital based study. This study was performed on 138 eyes of 69 patients, 64 eyes in microkeratome group and 74 eyes in femtosecond laser group for a period of 10 months from December 2017 to October 2018. The mean age of patients in microkeratome group was 23.34 years and in femtosecond laser group was 23.19 years. All patients in both the groups underwent one of the two procedure. Patients were assessed for subjective and objective refraction, presence of PVD, subjective complaints of floaters and axial length changes at each visit. At 1 week and 1 month postoperative period there was no PVD in either of the groups and none of the patients complained about disturbing floaters. At one week postoperative period, 17 eyes (26.5%) in microkeratome group and 22 eyes (29.6%) in femtosecond laser group had residual refraction ranging from -0.25D to -0.75D. The changes in axial length following surgery was 0.08 ± 0.08mm in microkeratome group and 0.1 ± 0.07mm in femtosecond laser group at one month. Our study did not demonstrate any difference between both the procedures with respect to posterior segment complications. Patients in our study are relatively younger compared to other studies and hence, age of the patient undergoing LASIK may affect the incidence of PVD.Both microkeratome assisted LASIK and femtosecond assisted LASIK were comparable with respect to posterior segment complications. The mean age of patients in this study is assumed to have an effect on outcome. Whereas axial length, power of the eye, procedure opted did not significantly have any impact on outcome. A larger population with longer follow up is needed in Indian population to conclude our results.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3