A study to compare intraocular pressure using Perkins and Schiotz tonometer with respect to Goldmann applanation tonometer as a gold standard in a tertiary health care centre, Navi Mumbai

Author:

Agrawal Mamta1,Ramakrishnan Reshma2,Kalapad Suvarna,Shrivastava Saurabh,Gandhi Priyanka

Affiliation:

1. M

2. Mahatma Gandhi Missions Institute of Health Sciences, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

To compare IOP measurement of Perkin’s tonometer and Schiotz tonometer with respect to Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).100 eyes of 50 patients aged 18 to 65 years presenting to Ophthalmology OPD were selected by randomization and detailed general and ophthalmic examination was done. IOP was measured using applanation tonometers (Perkin’s and GAT) and indentation tonometer (Schiotz tonometer) in that order. The study population included 38 male eyes and 62 female eyes; 50 right eyes and 50 left eyes. There was a statistically highly significant difference seen for the values between the groups (p<0.01) with higher values in IOP measured by GAT followed by IOP measured by Perkin’s tonometer and least in IOP measured by Schiotz tonometer.There was a statistically non significant difference seen for the values between Perkin’s tonometer and GAT (p>0.05). While there was a statistically highly significant difference seen for the values between GAT and Schiotz tonometer (p<0.01).There was a statistically non significant difference seen for the IOP values between right eye and left eye. There was a statistically non significant difference seen for the IOP values between males and females. Measurement of IOP with Perkin’s was closer to the values obtained by GAT. Perkin’s being portable, easy to use and precise tonometer than Schiotz tonometer, can be considered as an excellent substitute to GAT, for large scale examination, if cost is not a concern.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3