Affiliation:
1. Ranjeet Deshmukh Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
2. Clinician and Private Practitioner, United Kingdom
Abstract
Because of its acceptable accuracy, affordable price, accessible availability, and simplicity of handling, alginate impression materials continue to be a crucial component of dental practice despite many developments.The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the dimensional accuracy of two commercially available extended pour alginates (Cavex ColorChange and Algeniux) and a conventional alginate impression material (Zelgan) at different time intervals. On a maxillary model (Columbia Dentoform, Long Island City, N.Y.) the canines and the first molars were replaced with metal dies. This was selected as the master model. A ‘+’ mark was inscribed on these metal dies to serve as a reference for measurements. A self-cure acrylic resin custom tray was fabricated such that it was positioned over the model in the same spatial relationship with equal amount of space between the tray and model every time an impression was made. A total of 180 impressions were made of the master model, 15 impressions with each material at four different time intervals; immediate, 30 minutes, 48 hours (2 days) and 120 hours (5 days) to obtain gypsum cast. Manufacturer recommended water/powder ratios and storage conditions were followed in the process. Following the designated storage time interval, the casts were poured in minimum expansion Type IV dental stone. Measurements were done with a coordinate measuring machine after 7 days when the casts were completely dry. To evaluate and compare the dimensional accuracy of materials across various time points, for each group, the mean and standard deviation were estimated and subjected to statistical analysis. Two Way Repeated Measure Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine if the dimensions differed significantly across groups with time. The pair wise analysis for materials and time points was performed using Tukey’s post-hoc test. The p value was taken as significant when less than 0.05.Across different time points, a minimum % change was observed at immediate time point, which gradually increased at 30 minutes and at 48 hour, but at 120 hour the % change was maximum for all dimensions. Among three groups, Cavex ColorChange material showed minimum % change across time points, whereas Zelgan group showed maximum % change across all dimensions. All the paired differences were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) for Algeniux and Cavex ColorChange group. But for Zelgan group, the difference between all the pairs of time points were statistically significant (p < 0.05), except for the pair immediate vs. 30 minutes. These results suggest that Zelgan material showed significant changes after 30 min for all the dimensions.: The results revealed that both the extended pour alginates Cavex ColorChange and Algeniux produced dimensionally accurate casts at all time intervals while the conventional alginate, Zelgan was accurate only at immediate and 30-minute time interval. It was also observed that, among the 4-time intervals investigated, most accurate casts were obtained when the impressions were poured immediately.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Reference32 articles.
1. Influence of Repeat Pours of Addition Silicone Impressions on the Dimensional Accuracy of Casts
2. Rohanian A, Shabestari GO, Zeighami S, Samadi MJ, Shamshiri AR, Effect of storage time of extended-pour and conventional alginate impressions on dimensional accuracy of casts.J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11(6):655-64
3. Nandini VV, Venkatesh KV, Nair KC, Alginate impressions: A practical perspective.J Conserv Dent 2008;11(1):37-41
4. Wadhwa SS, Mehta R, Duggal N, Vasudeva K, The effect of pouring time on the dimensional accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4(3):313-8
5. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Alginate hydrocolloids.Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials.