Affiliation:
1. H
2. H.K.Es S. N Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
Abstract
To evaluate and compare the available literature on efficiency of different retention appliances in maintaining the results achieved after orthodontic treatment in cleft palate patients. On comparing the literature available on different retention appliances currently available, it was found that the cast metal retainers offered a more stable and rigid design to maintain the post treatment arch width and also provided the aesthetic replacement of the missing teeth in the cleft region by incorporating a pontic. The cleft lip and palate patients should be informed and motivated for a long term or indefinite retention phase irrespective of the type of retention appliance used. Presently, very few studies are available comparing the effectiveness of different retention protocols in cleft lip and palate patients. Hence, there is need to conduct evidence based high quality longitudinal studies to compare the effectiveness of different retention appliances.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Reference40 articles.
1. Kharbanda O, Shah B, Shukla D K, Dhaliwal R S, Grover A, Cleft lip and palate anomaly in India: Clinical profile, risk factors and current status of treatment: A hospital-based study.Indian Council Med Res Task Force Project Rep 2016;2016:1-74
2. Machos C C, Saunders , Orthodontic treatment for the cleft palate patient.Semin Orthod 1996;2(9):197-204
3. Kumar S, Speech understandability of repaired cleft palate patients pre and post caregiver training..Indian J Plastic Surg 2007;40(2):122-30
4. Tsai T P, Huang C S, Huang C C, See L C, Distribution patterns of primary and permanent dentition in children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. .Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1998;35(2):154-60
5. Gardner L K, Parr G R, Prosthetic rehabilitation of the cleft palate patient.Semin Orthod 1996;2(3):215-9