Affiliation:
1. Divya Jyoti College of Dental Sciences & Research, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
To determine the accuracy of the measurements made by the lab scanner on rubber-based impressions, the scanned plaster models, and the conventional plaster models by digital vernier calliper. The sample comprised of 20 randomly selected patients. Two sets of maxillary rubber base impressions were taken. The samples were then divided into three groups In Group A, stone casts obtained from the first rubber base impression, were measured manually using a digital vernier calliper having an accuracy of 0.01 mm. In Group B, the second rubber base impressions were measured using a lab scanner (3 shapes series E3) and finally in Group C, the stone models used in group A were scanned by the lab scanner and measurements were performed on 3 Shapes Ortho analyser software. The total of 9 linear measurements made were mesial distal tooth width, arch perimeter, arch length, buccolingual width, clinical crown height, intercanine, inter first premolar, inter second premolar and intermolar distance. The measurements were done twice and average value was recorded as the final result. Data were tabulated and analysed statistically. One way ANOVA test was done to analyse the differences between measurements. Results showed no statistically significant difference between mesial distal tooth width, arch perimeter, arch length, buccolingual width, clinical crown height, intercanine, inter first premolar, inter second premolar and intermolar distance. Digital models were as accurate as the manual measurements performed on casts by digital vernier calliper in establishing linear measurements. Thus, digital models were proven to be reliable and clinically acceptable.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Reference20 articles.
1. Moreira DD, Gribel BF, Torres GDR, Vasconcelos KDF, Freitas DQD, Ambrosano GMB, Reliability of measurements on virtual models obtained from scanning of impressions and conventional plaster models.Braz J Oral Sci 2014;13(4):297-302
2. Brusco N, Andreetto M, Lucchese L, Carmignato S, Cortelazzo GM, Metrological validation for 3D modeling of dental plaster casts.Med Eng Phys 2007;29(9):954-66
3. Labib MA, El-Beialy AR, Attia KH, Evaluation of the accuracy of digital models obtained using intraoral and extraoral scanners versus gold standard plaster model (diagnostic accuracy study).Open Med Imaging J 2020;10(3):151-63
4. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW, Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;129(6):794-803
5. Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis KA, Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.Angle Orthod 2003;73(3):301-6