Comparision of predicted and actual treatment outcome based on steiner cephalometric analysis using nemotech software

Author:

Verma Sneh Lata,Lepcha Rigzing1,Khanna Rohit2,Tikku Tripti,Maurya Rana Pratap,Srivastava Kamna

Affiliation:

1. Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

2. B

Abstract

Social and psychological concerns, improved function, appearance, and self-esteem encourages a patient to pursue Orthodontic treatment, for which extraction may or may not be needed.Conventionally steiner stick analysis or tweed head plate correction is followed to decide extraction during fixed orthodontic treatment for desirable treatment outcome. This study was designed to compare predicted position and angulation of maxillary and mandibular incisor by steiner stick analysis with the actual treatment outcome using memotech software.Sample was taken from our department consisting of pre and post treatment lateral cephalogram of 15 subject with age ranging from 20- 22years. Tracing was done using Nemotech software and values for Steiner’s analysis was obtained, both for, pre and post treatment tracing. Prediction was done by Steiner Stick analysis(SSA) on the pre treatment tracing.The position and angulation of Maxillary and Mandibular incisor was compared between prediction based on SSA and post treatment outcome. The parameters taken were U1-NA Linear and U1-NA angular and L1-NB Linear and L1-NB angular and comparison were made using Paired Student T test.: No significant difference was seen in U1-NA distance in (mm) and angulation(degree) Compared between predicted values(U1-NA- 2.478mm, 20.53 degree) and post treatment outcome (U1-NA-2.80mm, 22.733 degree) , p>0.05. Similarly no significant difference was seen in L1-NB distance (mm) compared between predicted (L1-NB 3.1227mm) and post treatment outcome(3.487 mm), p>0.05. However significant difference was seen for L1-NB angulation between predicted (22.573) and actual post treatment outcome(26.02), p<0.05.: Steiner Stick Analysis overestimated the values for angulation for Mandibular Incisors. This could be attributed to variability in mechanics or small size sample. Further studies should aim at comparisons done in larger sample size.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3