Comparing two different doses of propofol after sevoflurane induction for intubation in paediatric patients without use of neuromuscular blocking agents

Author:

Muneer Khawer,Khurshid Hina,Chandrakala K R,Chandrika Y R

Abstract

In the practice of paediatric anaesthesia, intubation of trachea without using neuromuscular blocking agents is becoming commoner more so in conditions in which muscle relaxants are not preferred. Different combinations of drugs including opioids, intravenous agents and inhalational agents are being used for facilitating endotracheal intubation when muscle relaxants are not used. In this study we compared intubating conditions in paediatric patients after sevoflurane induction and propofol in two different doses.80 children of 2 to 12 years age undergoing elective surgeries were divided into two groups P2 and P3 of 40 each. After sevoflurane induction and fentanyl 2mcg/kg I.V. group P2 received propofol 2mg/kg and group P3 received propofol 3mg/kg I.V. The two groups were compared with respect to intubating conditions and haemodynamic parameters. Clinically acceptable intubating conditions were seen in all patients in both groups. Excellent intubating conditions were more in group P3 (87.5%) than group P2 (80%). Haemodynamic parameters showed no significant difference between the two groups. In paediatric patients, endotracheal intubation can be comfortably performed without muscle relaxantsby using propofol and fentanyl with sevoflurane induction with no respiratory or haemodynamic adverse events. Propofol in a dose of 3mg/kg gives better intubating conditions than 2mg/kg without adverse haemodynamic effects, although 2mg/kg propofol also gives acceptable intubating conditions.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Sabapathy V A, Thilaak P, Gopal S S M, Pongiyanadar S, Endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants in children undergoing cleft lip, palate and alveolar surgery. A comparative study of sevoflurane and propofol.J Clin Diag Res 2011;5:1421-5

2. Srivastava U, Kumar A, Gandhi N K, Saxena S, Agarwal S, Comparison of propofol and fentanyl with thiopentone and suxamethonium for tracheal intubation in children.Ind J Anaesth 2001;45:263-6

3. Steyn M.P., Quinn A.M., Gillepse J.A., Miller D.C., Best C.J., Morton N.S., Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular block in children.Br J Anaesth 1994;72(4):403-6

4. Braga A, Braga F S, Poterio G M, Filier P R, Cremonesi E, The effect of different doses of propofol on tracheal intubating conditions without muscle relaxants in children.Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001;18:384-8

5. Volkan H, Tracheal intubation without use of muscle relaxants: Comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil.Anesth Pain 2012;1:210-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3