Transversus abdominis plane block versus wound site infiltration using 0.25% bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia after caesarean delivery performed under subarachnoid block

Author:

Kumar Deepak,Wadhawan Sonia,Kohli Amit,Bhadoria Poonam,Kumar Abhijit

Abstract

: Transversus abdominis planeTAP) block has been described as an effective technique to reduce postoperative pain after caesarean section. Wound site infiltration (WSI) has been a traditional method for pain relief. In our study we attempt to compare the analgesic effect of TAP block with wound site infiltration after caesarean section. A randomized comparative study was conducted on 60 parturients. Patients were randomized into Group T (TAP block, n=30) and Group I (WSI, n=30). Spinal anaesthesia was administered and at the end of surgery, Group T was administered TAP block with 20 ml of 0.25% of bupivacaine on each side and in Group I, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was infiltrated along the wound site. Postoperatively parameters assessed were time to first rescue analgesia, postoperatively patient’s Numeric pain score (NPS) which was assessed periodically over 24hrs and if NPS ≥4 or patient demanded rescue analgesia, Inj diclofenac 75mg i/m was given as first rescue analgesic, total number of doses of first rescue analgesic given over 24hrs, total number of second rescue analgesic and complications were assessed.: The mean time to first rescue analgesia in Group T was 13.40±4.51 hours and in Group I was 6.20±4.25 hours (p-0.001). NPS at 2, 4,6,12 and 24 hours were lower in Group T compared to Group I. Also, analgesic requirement in first 24hours was significantly less in Group T (p-0.001).: TAP block was found to be superior to wound site infiltration in providing effective postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing caesarean section.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3