Comparative study of oxiport laryngoscope blade versus miller laryngoscope blade for intubation in neonates and infants during general anesthesia, a prospective randomized controlled study

Author:

Gandhi Nimit1,Bhatt Swati2,Goswami Anisha

Affiliation:

1. SSG Hospital and Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

2. S

Abstract

Neonates and infants are prone to oxygen desaturation during the induction of general anethesia. Pharyngeal oxygen insufflation has been shown to delay the onset and severity of desaturation during apnea. We took this comparative study with the hypothesis that Oxiport Blade delays the time of onset as well as severity of desaturation as compared to Miller Blade. Eighty neonates and infants undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups:-Oxiport or Miller. (Laryngoscopy performed with Oxiport or Miller Blade respectively). Results were observed in terms of lowest SPO2 attained during Intubation with each Blade, time for 1% desaturation from baseline, desaturation rate, time for intubation and Heart rate. Data from 80 patients were available for final analysis: Oxiport(n=40)-Group O and Miller(n=40)-Group M. Mean lowest SPO2 attained during laryngoscopy in Group O was 97.77±2.81 and with Group M was 92.42±3.71 with a P-value<0.001. The Rate of Saturation achieved in Group O was 0.091±0.018 sec as compared to 0.342±0.122 sec in Group M and p value was <0.001. The time for 1% desaturation from baseline in Group O was 17.69±3.18 sec as compared to 10.4 ±2.09 sec in Group M with p value<0.001. The time for intubation and average heart rate were comparable in both the groups. Apnoeic Laryngeal Oxygen insufflation with Oxiport Blade decreases the incidence and severity of desaturation during intubation in neonates and infants.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3