Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients

Author:

Phalgune Deepak,Yallawar Nipun1,Thatte Janhavi2,Mahadik Shripad

Affiliation:

1. Poona Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India

2. P

Abstract

There are many studies in India that have compared direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in adults but the published data regarding paediatric population which needs special consideration is limited. The present study was aimed to compare the efficacy of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in endotracheal intubation in paediatric patients.The present randomised controlled research was done in 64 children of one to five years that underwent pre-planned surgery. Children were divided into direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy groups by randomization. The comparison of the time required for the best visualisation of glottis was the primary outcome measure. The comparison of the time to intubation and number of attempts were the secondary outcome measures. An unpaired student’s t-test and the Chi-square/ Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the quantitative and qualitative variables respectively.Mean time required for the best visualisation of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy was 6.1 sec and 5.3 sec respectively (p-value = 0.010). The mean time to intubation of video laryngoscopy was 15.3 sec while that of direct laryngoscopy was 13.1 sec (p-value = 0.001). The first attempt success rate was 29/32 (90.6%) in the video laryngoscopy group whereas it was 28/32 (87.5%) in the direct laryngoscopy group (p-value = 0.580).Time required for the best visualisation of glottis and time to intubation were significantly higher in video laryngoscopy as compared to direct laryngoscopy group.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3