Affiliation:
1. Bokaro General Hospital, Jharkhand, India
Abstract
Both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation elicit a sympathetic and parasympathetic response, which varies depending on the depth of anaesthesia, duration of laryngoscopy, and patient characteristics. Although different methods have been used to suppress the response, an ideal agent has yet to be discovered. This study compares and contrasts the effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous magnesium sulphate in reducing hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.: This 18-month prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative research was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Bokaro General Hospital, Bokaro Steel City, Jharkhand. One hundred twenty consenting study participants were randomly divided into three groups of forty. Before induction, Group A received IV normal saline as a placebo. Group B received 1 mcg/kg IV dexmedetomidine before induction, while Group C received 30 mg/kg IV 50% magnesium sulphate before induction.: Gender distribution was consistent and equal among 120 patients. Gender, age, weight, ASA, and type of surgery did not differ significantly across groups. The three groups had no statistically significant difference in baseline hemodynamic parameters. When compared to the Control Group (A), there were statistically significant changes in hemodynamic parameters in the Dexmedetomidine (B) and Magnesium sulphate (C) groups. There was no hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, or arrhythmias.: Dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate efficiently reduced the hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, although dexmedetomidine attenuated the sympathetic response more effectively.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Reference15 articles.
1. Rowbotham ES, Magill I, Anaesthetics in the plastic surgery of the face and jaws.Proc R Soc Med 1921;14:17-27
2. Vohra A, Kumar S, Charlton AJ, Olukoga AO, Boulton AJM, Mcleod D, Effect of diabetes mellitus on the cardiovascular responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation.Br J Anaesth 1993;71(2):258-61
3. Gupta A, Wakhloo R, Gupta V, Mehta A, Kapoor BB, Comparison of Esmolol and Lignocaine for Attenuation of Cardiovascular Stress response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation.JK Sci 2009;11:78-81
4. Kovac AL, Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.J Clin Anesth 1996;8(1):63-79
5. Prys-Roberts C, Greene LT, Meloche R, Foëx P, Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension ii: Haemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation.Br J Anaesth 1971;43(6):531-47