Comparing the efficacy and haemodynamic response between intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with isobaric 0.75% ropivacaine using fentanyl as adjuvant in patients undergoing infra umbilical surgeries

Author:

Kumar R Arun,Preetha I

Abstract

Central neuraxial blockade is the most widely used form of regional anesthesia in surgeries involving abdominal, urological, obstetric, gynaecological and lower limb. The nerve blocking properties of the R and S-enantiomers were similar but that the S-enantiomer was less cardiotoxic. The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy and haemodynamic response between intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine with isobaric 0.75% Ropivacaine using Fentanyl as adjuvant in patients undergoing infra umbilical surgeries. 60 patients of age group between 25 – 65 years belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) 1 and 2 posted for general surgical, urological, orthopaedic and gynaecological procedures involving lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia divided into two groups of 30 each and randomly allocated to one of the two below mentioned groups: Bupivacaine group (Group B) n=30; Ropivacaine group (Group R) n=30 Chi-square test and Student’s ‘t’ test were used to analyse the results. The sensory block in Bupivacaine group B was significantly higher compared to Ropivacaine group R attaining statistical significance. The 3 minutes motor block, incidence of hypotension was denser and higher in Bupivacaine group compared with Ropivacaine group. Incidence of bradycardia was not significantly different between the two groups.Although the onset of motor blockade was denser in Bupivacaine group, the total duration of motor blockade was similar between the groups. We conclude from our study that 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine produces similar duration of efficacy with stable haemodynamics, as compared with 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine.

Publisher

IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3