Affiliation:
1. Mamata Medical College & General Hospital, Khammam, Telangana, India
2. M
Abstract
Pregnancy induced Hypertension (PIH) is strongly associated with intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR), low birth weight (LBW) and admission to NICU. PIH is not by itself an indication for caesarean delivery. However, the incidence of caesarean is high because of the development of complications in mother and the need to deliver prematurely. To compare the immediate morbidity and survival advantage of LBW vertex presenting babies with the mode of delivery in hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancies. This was a comparative cross-sectional study done on women admitted to the labour ward during the study period with PIH delivering a baby through either a vaginal delivery or a caesarean section with a birthweight of <2.5kgs. A detailed history taking and clinical examination was done. Babies were followed up for one week following delivery to note down the early neonatal outcome. In this study, over all there was no statistically significant difference in neonatal outcome in both vaginal delivery and caesarean section groups. However, there was slight increased incidence of prematurity (68% vs 64%), Birth Asphyxia (14% vs 8%), Sepsis (8% vs 6%), IVH (6% vs 2%) and Hyperbilirubinemia (16% vs 14%) in vaginal delivery group. While, RDS (20% vs 14%) and NEC (4% vs 2%) had higher incidence in caesarean delivery group. Overall, prematurity and IUGR resulting in LBW, contributed to these neonatal complications. Caesarean delivery offers no short-term survival advantage compared with vaginal delivery for LBW vertex presenting foetuses in PIH patients. Neonatal outcomes are not worsened by spontaneous or induced vaginal delivery in women with hypertension with good control and also decreases morbidity due to caesarean section to the mother.
Publisher
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference25 articles.
1. Montan S, Sjoberg O, Svenningsen N, Hypertension in pregnancy-fetal and infant outcome.Clin Exp Hypertens 1987;62:337-48
2. Blackwell SC, Redman ME, Tomlinson M, Landwehr JB, Tuynman M, Gonik B, Labour induction for preterm severe preeclamptic patient: is it worth the effort.J Matern Fetal Med 2001;10:305-11
3. Barber EL, Lundberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL, Indications contributing to the increasing caesarean delivery rate.Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(1):29-38
4. Chibber RM, Severe preeclampsia and the very-low-birth-weight infant. The controversy over delivery mode continues.J Reprod Med 2002;47(11):925-30
5. Latha P, Ganesan S, Evaluation of Serum Uric Acid and Lipid Profile In Gestational Hypertension.Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2013;4(2):496-502