The Relationship Between Subjectivity and Ambivalence in the Black Mirror Series

Author:

AKYOL OKTAN Kevser1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

One of the prominent elements of modernity is the desire to eliminate ambivalences. The desire for certainty is also very decisive in rational subject definitions. However, in today’s societies, the idea that the basis of individuals’ existence as subjects in social life is gradually eroded, that subjectivity is intertwined with ambiguities has begun to come to the fore. It can be said that the ambivalence has destructive effects in the process of the individual’s being able to create himself as a subject, as well as the possibilities that allow to think about new types of subjectivity. This double-sided relationship between ambivalence and subjectivity is frequently mentioned in popular culture products, especially in dystopian narratives. In this study, the subjectivity-ambivalence relationship is discussed in the Black Mirror series. A qualitative analysis of all parts of the series selected by the purposive sampling technique was made. The series examined within the framework of the characters’ status of being a subject-passive, their struggle to exist as a subject/active, if any. These struggles, which emerged as the ambiguity of dualist structures such as subject-object, perpetrator-victim, good-evil in the series, have been questioned in the context of what kind of negativities ambiguities are associated with in the construction of a free and independent individual, or whether they make it possible to think about the possibilities of liberation.

Publisher

SineFilozofi

Subject

General Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. Adanır, O. (2010). Fikir Mimarları Dizisi – 22: Baudrillard. İstanbul: Say Publishing.

2. Allard-Huver, F. ve Escurignan, J. (2018). Black Mirror’s ‘Nosedive’ as a New Panopticon: Interveillance and Digital Parrhesia in Alternative Realities. Black Mirror and Critical Media Theory. Angela M. Cirucci and Barry Vacker (ed.), 43-54.

3. Alleyne, O. (2018). Unbearable Burden: Discipline, Punishment, and Moral Dystopia in Black Mirror’s ‘White Bear’. Black Mirror and Critical Media Theory, Angela M. Cirucci and Barry Vacker (ed.), 185-198.

4. Baudrillard, J. (2006). Sessiz Yığınların Gölgesinde. Oğuz Adanır (trans.), Ankara: Doğu-Batı Publishing.

5. Baudrillard, J. (2008). Fatal Strategies. Philippe Beitchman and W. G. J. Nieslu- Chowski (trans.), Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3