What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspective
-
Published:2023-07-13
Issue:13s
Volume:55
Page:1-37
-
ISSN:0360-0300
-
Container-title:ACM Computing Surveys
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ACM Comput. Surv.
Author:
Tang Zeyu1ORCID,
Zhang Jiji2ORCID,
Zhang Kun1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Carnegie Mellon University, United States
2. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Abstract
We review and reflect on fairness notions proposed in machine learning literature and make an attempt to draw connections to arguments in moral and political philosophy, especially theories of justice. We survey dynamic fairness inquiries and further consider the long-term impact induced by current prediction and decision. We present a flowchart that encompasses implicit assumptions and expected outcomes of different fairness inquiries on the data-generating process, the predicted outcome, and the induced impact, respectively. We demonstrate the importance of matching the mission (what kind of fairness to enforce) and the means (which appropriate fairness spectrum to analyze) to fulfill the intended purpose.
Funder
NSF-Convergence Accelerator Track-D
National Institutes of Health
Apple Inc.
KDDI Research
Quris AI
IBT
RGC of Hong Kong
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science
Reference211 articles.
1. Roles for computing in social change
2. Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, Miroslav Dudik, John Langford, and Hanna Wallach. 2018. A reductions approach to fair classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 60–69.
3. What Is the Point of Equality?
4. The Imperative of Integration
5. What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献