What Do We Do? Lessons Learned from Conducting Systematic Reviews to Improve HCI Dissemination-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What Do We Do? Lessons Learned from Conducting Systematic Reviews to Improve HCI Dissemination

Published:2024-05-11 Issue: Volume: Page:1-8
ISSN:
Container-title:Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Ibrahim Zaidat¹^ORCID,Karimi Pegah²^ORCID,Martin-Hammond Aqueasha³^ORCID,Harrington Christina⁴^ORCID,Siek Katie A.⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, & Engineering, Indiana University, United States

2. Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, United States

3. School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, United States

4. HCI Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, United States

5. Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, United States

Publisher

ACM

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3613905.3637117

Reference34 articles.

1. Wearable Identities: Understanding Wearables’ Potential for Supporting the Expression of Queer Identities

2. J Brender Jan Talmon Elske Ammenwerth Jytte Brender Nicolette de Keizer Pirkko Nykänen Michael Rigby and E. Ammenwerth. 2013. STARE-HI–Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics. Applied Clinical Informatics 4 (01 2013) 331–358. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-04-RA-0024

3. Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI

4. Iain Chalmers, Larry V Hedges, and Harris Cooper. 2002. A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & the health professions 25, 1 (2002), 12–37.

5. History of evidence synthesis to assess treatment effects: Personal reflections on something that is very much alive