Gigified Knowledge Work: Understanding Knowledge Gaps When Knowledge Work and On-Demand Work Intersect

Author:

Wilkins Denise J.1,Hulikal Muralidhar Srihari2,Meijer Max3,Lascau Laura4,Lindley Siân3

Affiliation:

1. Microsoft, London, United Kingdom

2. Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

3. Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom

4. University College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Online freelance platforms can transform knowledge work. However, 'gigification' also presents challenges, including how freelance workers can access and work with knowledge, which prior research has not examined. Through a qualitative interview study, we identify disparities in how freelancers who work for enterprise companies are able to utilize knowledge as part of their work, when compared with traditional employees of similar organizations. We examine how 38 knowledge workers (21 freelancers, 17 employees) deploy knowledge, work skillfully and mobilize resources to meet knowledge needs. We find that both employees and freelancers understand their own ability to act knowledgeably as a dynamic, collaborative, negotiated and emergent accomplishment. However, for freelancers, the dynamic dimensions of knowledge work - such as helping others see the meaning and value of their work, and creating ties between their work and the enterprise - are only minimally-legitimized and minimally-supported by organizing structures and tools. We present our results as 'knowledge gaps', and propose design recommendations to reduce these gaps and consequently make on-demand knowledge work more effective and sustainable.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference112 articles.

1. Augmenting organizational memory

2. Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management

3. Organizational memory: processes, boundary objects, and trajectories

4. Mark S Ackerman Christine Halverson etal 2004. Sharing expertise: The next step for knowledge management. Social capital and information technology (2004) 273--299. Mark S Ackerman Christine Halverson et al. 2004. Sharing expertise: The next step for knowledge management. Social capital and information technology (2004) 273--299.

5. M. S. Ackerman and T. W. Malone . 1990. Answer Garden: A Tool for Growing Organizational Memory . In Proc. of the ACM SIGOIS and IEEE CS TC-OA Conf. on Office Information Systems ( Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (COCS '90). ACM, NY, USA, 31--39. https://doi.org/10.1145/91474.91485 10.1145/91474.91485 M. S. Ackerman and T. W. Malone. 1990. Answer Garden: A Tool for Growing Organizational Memory. In Proc. of the ACM SIGOIS and IEEE CS TC-OA Conf. on Office Information Systems (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (COCS '90). ACM, NY, USA, 31--39. https://doi.org/10.1145/91474.91485

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3