DevEx in Action-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

DevEx in Action

Published:2023-12-31 Issue:6 Volume:21 Page:47-77
ISSN:1542-7730
Container-title:Queue
language:en
Short-container-title:Queue

Author:

Forsgren Nicole¹,Kalliamvakou Eirini²,Noda Abi³,Greiler Michaela³,Houck Brian⁴,Storey Margaret-Anne⁵

Affiliation:

1. Microsoft Research

2. Github Next

3. DX

4. Microsoft

5. University Of Victoria and DX

Abstract

DevEx (developer experience) is garnering increased attention at many software organizations as leaders seek to optimize software delivery amid the backdrop of fiscal tightening and transformational technologies such as AI. Intuitively, there is acceptance among technical leaders that good developer experience enables more effective software delivery and developer happiness. Yet, at many organizations, proposed initiatives and investments to improve DevEx struggle to get buy-in as business stakeholders question the value proposition of improvements.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3639443

Reference26 articles.

1. Interdisciplinary examination of the costs and benefits of enlarged jobs: A job design quasi-experiment.

2. A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study

3. Chin, W. W. 2010. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, eds. V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang, 655?690. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29.

4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2008. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

5. Edwards, J. R., Scully, J. A., Brtek, M. D. 1999. The measurement of work: hierarchical representation of the Multimethod Job Design Questionnaire. Personnel Psychology 52(2), 305?334; https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-05792-002.