User Perceptions of Security and Privacy for Group Chat

Author:

Oesch Sean1,Abu-Salma Ruba2,Diallo Oumar1,Krämer Juliane3,Simmons James1,Wu Justin4,Ruoti Scott1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee

2. King’s College London, London, UK

3. TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

4. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

Abstract

Secure messaging tools are an integral part of modern society. To understand users’ security and privacy perceptions and requirements for secure group chat, we surveyed 996 respondents in the US and UK. Our results show that group chat presents important security and privacy challenges, some of which are not present in one-to-one chat. For example, users need to be able to manage and monitor group membership, establish trust for new group members, and filter content that they share in different chat contexts. We also find that respondents lack mechanisms for determining which tools are secure and instead rely on non-technical strategies for protecting their privacy—for example, self-filtering and carefully tracking group membership. To better understand how these results relate to existing tools, we conduct cognitive walkthroughs (a form of expert usability review) for five popular group chat tools. Our results demonstrate that while existing tools address some items identified in our surveys, this support is partial and is insufficient in many cases. As such, there is a need for improved group chat tools that better align with user perceptions and requirements. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations on improving the security and usability of secure group chat.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. Ruba Abu-Salma, Kat Krol, Simon Parkin, Victoria Koh, Kevin Kwan, Jazib Mahboob, Zahra Traboulsi, and M. Angela Sasse. 2017. The security blanket of the chat world: An analytic evaluation and a user study of Telegram. In Proceedings of the European Workshop and Usable Security. Internet Society.

2. Ruba Abu-Salma, Elissa M. Redmiles, Blase Ur, and Miranda Wei. 2018. Exploring user mental models of end-to-end encrypted communication tools. In Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet.

3. Ruba Abu-Salma, M. Angela Sasse, Joseph Bonneau, Anastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, and Matthew Smith. 2017. Obstacles to the adoption of secure communication tools. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 137–153.

4. Wei Bai, Moses Namara, Yichen Qian, Patrick Gage Kelley, Michelle L. Mazurek, and Doowon Kim. 2016. An inconvenient trust: User attitudes toward security and usability tradeoffs for key-directory encryption systems. In Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. 113–130.

5. Internet privacy law: a comparison between the United States and the European Union

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3