Why and how to benchmark XML databases

Author:

Schmidt Albrecht1,Waas Florian2,Kersten Martin3,Florescu Daniela4,Carey Michael J.4,Manolescu Ioana5,Busse Ralph6

Affiliation:

1. CWI, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Microsoft Corp., One Microsoft Way, Redmond

2. Microsoft Corp., Redmond

3. CWI, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4. Propel Inc., San Jose

5. INRIA Rocquencourt, France

6. GMD-IPSI, Darmstadt, Germany

Abstract

Benchmarks belong to the very standard repertory of tools deployed in database development. Assessing the capabilities of a system, analyzing actual and potential bottlenecks, and, naturally, comparing the pros and cons of different systems architectures have become indispensable tasks as databases management systems grow in complexity and capacity. In the course of the development of XML databases the need for a benchmark framework has become more and more evident: a great many different ways to store XML data have been suggested in the past, each with its genuine advantages, disadvantages and consequences that propagate through the layers of a complex database system and need to be carefully considered. The different storage schemes render the query characteristics of the data variably different. However, no conclusive methodology for assessing these differences is available to date.In this paper, we outline desiderata for a benchmark for XML databases drawing from our own experience of developing an XML repository, involvement in the definition of the standard query language, and experience with standard benchmarks for relational databases.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Information Systems,Software

Reference20 articles.

1. R. Bourett. XML Database Products. http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/XMLDatabaseProds.htm 2000. R. Bourett. XML Database Products. http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/XMLDatabaseProds.htm 2000.

2. R. Bourret. XML and Databases. http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/XMLAndDatabases.htm 2000. R. Bourret. XML and Databases. http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/XMLAndDatabases.htm 2000.

3. D. Chamberlin P. Fankhauser M. Marchiori and J. Robie. XML Query Use Cases. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlquery-use-cases 2001. D. Chamberlin P. Fankhauser M. Marchiori and J. Robie. XML Query Use Cases. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlquery-use-cases 2001.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Performance Evaluation of the Clustering-based Labelling Scheme;2022 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS);2022-07-04

2. Database Benchmarks;Encyclopedia of Database Systems;2018

3. Database Benchmarks;Encyclopedia of Database Systems;2017

4. Benchmarking Performance-Critical Components in a Native XML Database System;Database Systems for Advanced Applications;2009

5. A nine year study of file system and storage benchmarking;ACM Transactions on Storage;2008-05-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3