The Gap Between Trustworthy AI Research and Trustworthy Software Research: A Tertiary Study

Author:

Liu Bohan1ORCID,Li Gongyuan2ORCID,Zhang He2ORCID,Jin Yuzhe3ORCID,Wang Zikuan2ORCID,Shao Dong2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nanjing University Software Institute, Nanjing, China

2. Nanjing University Software Institute, Nanjing China

3. Nanjing University, Nanjing China

Abstract

With the increasing application and complexity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, the trustworthiness of AI has garnered widespread attention across various fields. An AI system is a specific type of software system with unique trustworthiness requirements due to its distinctive characteristics in data and algorithms. Our objective is to investigate the state of the art in trustworthy AI and trustworthy software separately and to analyze the connections and gaps between them. To this end, we conducted a tertiary study, which is a systematic literature review of existing secondary studies. These secondary studies are divided into two groups: one focuses on trustworthy AI and the other on trustworthy software. We developed frameworks for both trustworthy AI and trustworthy software, summarized the definitions of quality attributes in a structured format, and analyzed the similarities of these attributes between the two areas. Additionally, we created a swimlane diagram illustrating trustworthy practices throughout the development life-cycle and in relation to specific quality attributes. Researchers in these two areas originate from distinct research communities, leading to a significant gap between the trustworthiness of AI and software. However, we believe that existing research on trustworthy software can effectively address some gaps in trustworthy AI research, and we have identified evidence of connections between the two areas.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference45 articles.

1. ISO/IEC 25010: 2011. 2011. Systems and software engineering—Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and software quality models.

2. Software engineering body of knowledge. IEEE Computer Society;Abran Alain;Angela Burgess,2004

3. Julia Angwin Jeff Larson Surya Mattu and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias risk assessments in criminal sentencing. ProPublica May 23(2016).

4. Artificial intelligence poised to ride a new wave

5. Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3