A Meta-learning Approach to Mitigating the Estimation Bias of Q-learning

Author:

Tan Tao1ORCID,Xie Hong1ORCID,Shi Xiaoyu2ORCID,Shang Mingsheng2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Science and Technology of China, China and State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, China

2. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

It is a longstanding problem that Q-learning suffers from the overestimation bias. This issue originates from the fact that Q-learning uses the expectation of maximum Q-value to approximate the maximum expected Q-value. A number of algorithms, such as Double Q-learning, were proposed to address this problem by reducing the estimation of maximum Q-value, but this may lead to an underestimation bias. Note that this underestimation bias may have a larger performance penalty than the overestimation bias. Different from previous algorithms, this paper studies this issue from a fresh perspective, i.e., meta-learning view, which leads to our Meta-Debias Q-learning. The main idea is to extract the maximum expected Q-value with meta-learning over multiple tasks to remove the estimation bias of maximum Q-value and help the agent choose the optimal action more accurately. However, there are two challenges: (1) How to automatically select suitable training tasks? (2) How to positively transfer the meta-knowledge from selected tasks to remove the estimation bias of maximum Q-value? To address the two challenges mentioned above, we quantify the similarity between the training tasks and the test task. This similarity enables us to select appropriate “partial” training tasks and helps the agent extract the maximum expected Q-value to remove the estimation bias. Extensive experiment results show that our Meta-Debias Q-learning outperforms SOTA baselines drastically in three evaluation indicators, i.e., maximum Q-value, policy, and reward. More specifically, our Meta-Debias Q-learning only underestimates \(1.2*10^{-3}\) than the maximum expected Q-value in the multi-armed bandit environment; and only differs \(5.04\%-5\%=0.04\%\) than the optimal policy in the two states MDP environment. In addition, we compare the uniform weight and our similarity weight. Experiment results reveal fundamental insights into why our proposed algorithm outperforms in the maximum Q-value, policy, and reward.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference49 articles.

1. Oron Anschel, Nir Baram, and Nahum Shimkin. 2017. Averaged-dqn: Variance reduction and stabilization for deep reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 176–185.

2. Neuro-dynamic programming: an overview

3. James L Carroll and Kevin Seppi. 2005. Task similarity measures for transfer in reinforcement learning task libraries. In Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005., Vol. 2. IEEE, 803–808.

4. Edoardo Cetin and Oya Celiktutan. 2023. Learning Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 37. 6971–6979.

5. Xinyue Chen, Che Wang, Zijian Zhou, and Keith W. Ross. 2021. Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Model. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=AY8zfZm0tDd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3