Affiliation:
1. New York University, New York, NY
2. Columbia University, New York, NY
Abstract
Many valuable text databases on the web have noncrawlable contents that are “hidden” behind search interfaces. Metasearchers are helpful tools for searching over multiple such “hidden-web” text databases at once through a unified query interface. An important step in the metasearching process is database selection, or determining which databases are the most relevant for a given user query. The state-of-the-art database selection techniques rely on statistical summaries of the database contents, generally including the database vocabulary and associated word frequencies. Unfortunately, hidden-web text databases typically do not export such summaries, so previous research has developed algorithms for constructing
approximate
content summaries from document samples extracted from the databases via querying. We present a novel “focused-probing” sampling algorithm that detects the topics covered in a database and adaptively extracts documents that are representative of the topic coverage of the database. Our algorithm is the first to construct content summaries that include the frequencies of the words in the database. Unfortunately, Zipf's law practically guarantees that for any relatively large database, content summaries built from moderately sized document samples will fail to cover many low-frequency words; in turn, incomplete content summaries might negatively affect the database selection process, especially for short queries with infrequent words. To enhance the sparse document samples and improve the database selection decisions, we exploit the fact that topically similar databases tend to have similar vocabularies, so samples extracted from databases with a similar topical focus can complement each other. We have developed two database selection algorithms that exploit this observation. The first algorithm proceeds hierarchically and selects the best categories for a query, and then sends the query to the appropriate databases in the chosen categories. The second algorithm uses “shrinkage,” a statistical technique for improving parameter estimation in the face of sparse data, to enhance the database content summaries with category-specific words. We describe how to modify existing database selection algorithms to adaptively decide (at runtime) whether shrinkage is beneficial for a query. A thorough evaluation over a variety of databases, including 315 real web databases as well as TREC data, suggests that the proposed sampling methods generate high-quality content summaries and that the database selection algorithms produce significantly more relevant database selection decisions and overall search results than existing algorithms.
Funder
Division of Information and Intelligent Systems
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems
Reference76 articles.
1. Adamic L. A. 2002. Zipf power-laws and Pareto---A ranking tutorial. http://ginger.hpl.hp.com/shl/papers/ranking/ranking.html. Adamic L. A. 2002. Zipf power-laws and Pareto---A ranking tutorial. http://ginger.hpl.hp.com/shl/papers/ranking/ranking.html.
2. Snowball
3. Word Frequency Distributions
4. A probabilistic solution to the selection and fusion problem in distributed information retrieval
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Deep Web Selection Based on Entity Association;Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks;2020-07-01
2. Enhancing information source selection using a genetic algorithm and social tagging;International Journal of Information Management;2017-12
3. Structural analysis and classification of search interfaces for the deep web;The Computer Journal;2017-10-13
4. Ranking Deep Web Text Collections for Scalable Information Extraction;Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management;2015-10-17
5. What's the big deal about big data?;Big Data and Information Analytics;2015-09