Turnover of Companies in OpenStack: Prevalence and Rationale

Author:

Zhang Yuxia1ORCID,Liu Hui1,Tan Xin2,Zhou Minghui3,Jin Zhi3,Zhu Jiaxin4

Affiliation:

1. School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China

2. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment, Beijing, China

3. School of Computer Science and Technology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of High Confidence Software Technologies, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China

4. Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Abstract

To achieve commercial goals, companies have made substantial contributions to large open-source software (OSS) ecosystems such as OpenStack and have become the main contributors. However, they often withdraw their employees for a variety of reasons, which may affect the sustainability of OSS projects. While the turnover of individual contributors has been extensively investigated, there is a lack of knowledge about the nature of companies’ withdrawal. To this end, we conduct a mixed-methods empirical study on OpenStack to reveal how common company withdrawals were, to what degree withdrawn companies made contributions, and what the rationale behind withdrawals was. By analyzing the commit data of 18 versions of OpenStack, we find that the number of companies that have left is increasing and even surpasses the number of companies that have joined in later versions. Approximately 12% of the companies in each version have exited by the next version. Compared to the sustaining companies that joined in the same version, the withdrawn companies tend to have a weaker contribution intensity but contribute to a similar scope of repositories in OpenStack. Through conducting a developer survey, we find four aspects of reasons for companies’ withdrawal from OpenStack: company, community, developer, and project. The most common reasons lie in the company aspect, i.e., the company either achieved its goals or failed to do so. By fitting the survival analysis model, we find that commercial goals are associated with the probability of the company’s withdrawal, and that a company’s contribution intensity and scale are positively correlated with its retention. Maintaining good retention is important but challenging for OSS ecosystems, and our results may shed light on potential approaches to improve company retention and reduce the negative impact of company withdrawal.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Software

Reference80 articles.

1. Contributors’ Withdrawal from Online Collaborative Communities: The Case of OpenStreetMap

2. Defining small and medium enterprises: A critical review;Berisha G.;Social Science Electronic Publishing,2015

3. Selection Bias in Web Surveys

4. Detecting Patch Submission and Acceptance in OSS Projects

5. Christian Bird Alex Gourley Prem Devanbu Anand Swaminathan and Greta Hsu. 2007. Open borders? immigration in open source projects. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’07: ICSE Workshops 2007).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Grounded Theory of Cross-Community SECOs: Feedback Diversity Versus Synchronization;IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering;2023-10-01

2. Suboptimal Comments in Java Projects: From Independent Comment Changes to Commenting Practices;ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology;2023-03-29

3. An Introduction to Software Ecosystems;Software Ecosystems;2023

4. Corporate dominance in open source ecosystems: a case study of OpenStack;Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering;2022-11-07

5. How to characterize the health of an Open Source Software project? A snowball literature review of an emerging practice;The 18th International Symposium on Open Collaboration;2022-09-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3