User Experience and The Role of Personalization in Critiquing-Based Conversational Recommendation

Author:

Rana Arpit1,Sanner Scott1,Bouadjenek Mohamed Reda2,Dicarlantonio Ron3,Farmaner Gary3

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

2. Deakin University, Australia

3. iNAGO Inc. Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Critiquing — where users propose directional preferences to attribute values — has historically been a highly popular method for conversational recommendation. However, with the growing size of catalogs and item attributes, it becomes increasingly difficult and time-consuming to express all of one’s constraints and preferences in the form of critiquing. It is found to be even more confusing in case of critiquing failures: when the system returns no matching items in response to user critiques. To this end, it would seem important to combine a critiquing-based conversational system with a personalized recommendation component to capture implicit user preferences and thus reduce the user’s burden of providing explicit critiques. To examine the impact of such personalization on critiquing, this paper reports on a user study with 228 participants to understand user critiquing behavior for two different recommendation algorithms: (i) non-personalized , that recommends any item consistent with the user critiques; and (ii) personalized , which leverages a user’s past preferences on top of user critiques. In the study, we ask users to find a restaurant that they think is the most suitable to a given scenario by critiquing the recommended restaurants at each round of the conversation on the dimensions of price, cuisine, category, and distance. We observe that the non-personalized recommender leads to more critiquing interactions, more severe critiquing failures, overall more time for users to express their preferences, and longer dialogs to find their item of interest. We also observe that non-personalized users were less satisfied with the system’s performance. They find its recommendations less relevant, more unexpected, and somewhat equally diverse and surprising than those of personalized ones. The results of our user study highlight an imperative for further research on the integration of the two complementary components of personalization and critiquing to achieve the best overall user experience in future critiquing-based conversational recommender systems.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications

Reference42 articles.

1. Context-aware recommender systems;Adomavicius Gediminas;AI Magazine,2011

2. Case-based recommender systems;Bridge Derek;Knowledge Engineering Review,2005

3. Robin Burke . 2000. Knowledge-based recommender systems . In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Systems , vol. 60 , no.32. Marcel Dekker , 180–200. Robin Burke. 2000. Knowledge-based recommender systems. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Systems, vol.60, no.32. Marcel Dekker, 180–200.

4. The FindMe approach to assisted browsing;Burke D.;IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications,1997

5. Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2005. Trust building in recommender agents. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Personalization Recommender Systems and Intelligent User Interfaces at the 2nd International Conference on E-Business and Telecommunication Networks. Citeseer 135–145. Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2005. Trust building in recommender agents. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Personalization Recommender Systems and Intelligent User Interfaces at the 2nd International Conference on E-Business and Telecommunication Networks. Citeseer 135–145.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3