Affiliation:
1. Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK
2. The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel
3. Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Abstract
Traditionally users access their personal files mainly by using
folder navigation. We evaluate whether recent improvements in
desktop search have changed this fundamental aspect of Personal
Information Management (PIM). We tested this in two studies using
the same questionnaire: (a) The Windows Studya longitudinal
comparison of
Google Desktop
and
Windows XP Search
Companion
, and (b) The Mac Studya large scale comparison of Mac
Spotlight
and
Sherlock
. There were few effects for
improved search. First, regardless of search engine, there was a
strong navigation preference: on average, users estimated that they
used navigation for 56-68% of file retrieval events but searched
for only 4-15% of events. Second, the effect of improving the
quality of the search engine on search usage was limited and
inconsistent. Third, search was used mainly as a last resort when
users could not remember file location. Finally, there was no
evidence that using improved desktop search engines leads people to
change their filing habits to become less reliant on hierarchical
file organization. We conclude by offering theoretical explanations
for navigation preference, relating to differences between PIM and
Internet retrieval, and suggest alternative design directions for
PIM systems.
Funder
Sixth Framework Programme
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems
Cited by
90 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献