It’s Complicated: The Relationship between User Trust, Model Accuracy and Explanations in AI

Author:

Papenmeier Andrea1ORCID,Kern Dagmar1ORCID,Englebienne Gwenn2ORCID,Seifert Christin3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. GESIS — Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany

2. University of Twente, Drienerlolaan, Enschede NB, Netherlands

3. University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany and University of Twente, Drienerlolaan, Enschede NB, Netherlands

Abstract

Automated decision-making systems become increasingly powerful due to higher model complexity. While powerful in prediction accuracy, Deep Learning models are black boxes by nature, preventing users from making informed judgments about the correctness and fairness of such an automated system. Explanations have been proposed as a general remedy to the black box problem. However, it remains unclear if effects of explanations on user trust generalise over varying accuracy levels. In an online user study with 959 participants, we examined the practical consequences of adding explanations for user trust: We evaluated trust for three explanation types on three classifiers of varying accuracy. We find that the influence of our explanations on trust differs depending on the classifier’s accuracy. Thus, the interplay between trust and explanations is more complex than previously reported. Our findings also reveal discrepancies between self-reported and behavioural trust, showing that the choice of trust measure impacts the results.

Funder

Cancer Research Center Cologne Essen

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Human-Computer Interaction

Reference55 articles.

1. Elementary statistics: A modern approach;Altares P. S.;Rex Bookstore Inc. Manila, Philippines,2003

2. "What is relevant in a text document?": An interpretable machine learning approach

3. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI

4. Or Biran and Courtenay Cotton. 2017. Explanation and justification in machine learning: A survey. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-17 Workshop on Explainable AI (XAI).

5. Proxy tasks and subjective measures can be misleading in evaluating explainable AI systems

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3