Affiliation:
1. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA
2. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA
Abstract
The computer science research paper review process is largely human and time-intensive. More worrisome, review processes are frequently questioned, and often non-transparent. This work advocates applying computer science methods and tools to the computer science review process. As an initial exploration, we data mine the submissions, bids, reviews, and decisions from a recent top-tier computer networking conference. We empirically test several common hypotheses, including the existence of readability, citation, call-for-paper adherence, and topical bias. From our findings, we hypothesize review process methods to improve fairness, efficiency, and transparency.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Software
Reference25 articles.
1. IEEE ComSoc Technical Committee on Computer Communications mailing list archives Aug. 2010. https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/tccc/2010-August/thread.html. IEEE ComSoc Technical Committee on Computer Communications mailing list archives Aug. 2010. https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/tccc/2010-August/thread.html.
2. Thoughts on reviewing
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献