Scanning or Simply Unengaged in Reading? Opportune Moments for Pushed News Notifications and Their Relationship with Smartphone Users' Choice of News-reading Modes

Author:

Lin Chen-Chin1ORCID,Wu Chia-Chen1ORCID,Huang Ping-Ju2ORCID,Lai Yu-Hsin1ORCID,Ho Yi-Ting1ORCID,Chung Chih-Chi1ORCID,Chang Yung-Ju1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan Roc

2. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan Roc

Abstract

News notifications on smartphones provide a convenient way to stay informed, but their delivery timing can influence user engagement. Despite this, research on the impact of notification timing on reading behavior remains limited. Therefore, we developed NewsMoment, a news aggregation app that monitors user reading patterns and sends news notifications. Our experience sampling study with 46 NewsMoment users revealed four distinct reading modes: typical, comprehensive, scanning, and unengaged. Deep reading, encompassing typical and comprehensive modes, more often occurred during self-initiated browsing rather than through pushed news. Interestingly, shallow reading modes - unengaged and scanning - showed varying prevalence, associated triggers, and engagement, despite their similarities. Importantly, unengaged reading persisted regardless of users' perceived moment opportuneness, whereas scanning reading was more common during inopportune moments. These findings suggest that identifying opportune moments for news reading may primarily reduce scanning reading, without substantially impacting unengaged reading.

Funder

National Science and Technology Council

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference107 articles.

1. Piotr D. Adamczyk and Brian P. Bailey. 2004. If Not Now, When?: The Effects of Interruption at Different Moments within Task Execution . In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '04. ACM Press , Vienna, Austria, 271--278. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985727 10.1145/985692.985727 Piotr D. Adamczyk and Brian P. Bailey. 2004. If Not Now, When?: The Effects of Interruption at Different Moments within Task Execution. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '04. ACM Press, Vienna, Austria, 271--278. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985727

2. Understanding type I and type II errors, statistical power and sample size

3. Measuring Message Credibility

4. Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.

5. Understanding Online News Behaviors

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3