Comparing sequential and parallel code review techniques for formative feedback-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparing sequential and parallel code review techniques for formative feedback

Published:2018 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference on - ACE '18
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Luxton-Reilly Andrew¹,Lewis Arthur¹,Plimmer Beryl¹

Affiliation:

1. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Publisher

ACM Press

Reference28 articles.

1. Karen Anewalt. 2005. Using Peer Review As a Vehicle for Communication Skill Development and Active Learning.Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges21, 2 (Dec. 2005), 148--155. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1089053.1089074

2. R. E. Boyatzis. 1998.Thematic Analysis and Code Development: Transforming Qualitative Information.Sage Publications I, London.

3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology3, 2 (2006), 77--101.

4. Robert Davies and Teresa Berrow. 1998. An Evaluation of the Use of Computer Supported Peer Review for Developing Higher-level Skills.Computers & Education30, 1 (1998), 111--115.

5. Nancy Falchikov. 1995. Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment.Innovations in Education and Teaching International32, 2 (1995), 175--187.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Review of Peer Code Review in Higher Education;ACM Transactions on Computing Education;2020-09-30

2. Software Testing as Medium for Peer Feedback;United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research conference.;2020-08-25

3. Peer Validation and Generation Tool for Question Banks in Learning Management Systems;Communications in Computer and Information Science;2020