Exposing Stealthy Wash Trading on Automated Market Maker Exchanges

Author:

Gan Rundong1ORCID,Wang Le1ORCID,Xue Liang2ORCID,Lin Xiaodong3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Computer Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada

2. School of Information Technology, York University, Toronto, Canada

3. University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada

Abstract

Decentralized Finance (DeFi), a pivotal component of the emerging Web3 landscape, is gaining popularity but remains vulnerable to market manipulations, such as wash trading. Wash trading is an illegal practice, where traders buy and sell assets to themselves within cryptocurrency exchanges to artificially inflate trading volumes and distort market perceptions. However, current research primarily focuses on traditional exchanges based on the Order-Book mechanism (similar to stock markets), while ignoring the Automated Market Maker (AMM) exchanges, which dominate over 75% of the market and represent a significant innovation within the DeFi. This study utilizes entity recognition technology to detect wash trading on AMM exchanges within Ethereum-like systems, based on the understanding that colluding addresses (perceived as the same entity) must use ETH for transaction fees and exhibit direct or indirect ETH transfer links. We identify wash trading when addresses with transfer connections almost simultaneously buy and sell assets while their total asset holdings remain nearly constant. This comprehensive blockchain network analysis, compared to focusing solely on transactions within exchanges, unveils covert wash trading activities. Our detection method achieves a 95.9% recall and a 96.7% true negative rate in identifying pools affected by wash trading, demonstrating its superiority over existing methods. Furthermore, we apply our method to 98,945 pools from Uniswap V2 & V3 (the most popular AMM exchanges on Ethereum) and identify 1,070,626 abnormal transactions, totaling $27.51 billion in trading volume. Analysis of these transactions uncovers insights into wash traders’ behaviors, including the utilization of multiple addresses and the dual roles of certain addresses as wash traders and liquidity providers. These insights are crucial for developing more effective strategies to combat fraudulent activities in the DeFi ecosystem and enhance financial scrutiny.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference61 articles.

1. Ahto Buldas, Dirk Draheim, Mike Gault, and Märt Saarepera. 2022. Towards a foundation of Web3. In International Conference on Future Data and Security Engineering. Springer, 3–18.

2. Thomas Stackpole. Web3 is Our Chance to Make a Better Internet. [EB/OL]. ([n. d.]). https://hbr.org/2022/05/web3-is-our-chance-to-make-a-better-internet Accessed Jun 24, 2024.

3. An Ultra-Scalable Blockchain Platform for Universal Asset Tokenization: Design and Implementation

4. Kaihua Qin Liyi Zhou Yaroslav Afonin Ludovico Lazzaretti and Arthur Gervais. 2021. CeFi vs. DeFi–Comparing Centralized to Decentralized Finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08157(2021).

5. 2024. DeFiLlama - Decentralized Finance Analytics and Rankings. https://defillama.com/. (2024). Accessed: January 2024.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3