Engineers, Aware! Commercial Tools Disagree on Social Media Sentiment: Analyzing the Sentiment Bias of Four Major Tools

Author:

Jung Soon-Gyo1,Salminen Joni2,Jansen Bernard J.1

Affiliation:

1. Hamad bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar

2. University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland

Abstract

Large commercial sentiment analysis tools are often deployed in software engineering due to their ease of use. However, it is not known how accurate these tools are, and whether the sentiment ratings given by one tool agree with those given by another tool. We use two datasets - (1) NEWS consisting of 5,880 news stories and 60K comments from four social media platforms: Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook; and (2) IMDB consisting of 7,500 positive and 7,500 negative movie reviews - to investigate the agreement and bias of four widely used sentiment analysis (SA) tools: Microsoft Azure (MS), IBM Watson, Google Cloud, and Amazon Web Services (AWS). We find that the four tools assign the same sentiment on less than half (48.1%) of the analyzed content. We also find that AWS exhibits neutrality bias in both datasets, Google exhibits bi-polarity bias in the NEWS dataset but neutrality bias in the IMDB dataset, and IBM and MS exhibit no clear bias in the NEWS dataset but have bi-polarity bias in the IMDB dataset. Overall, IBM has the highest accuracy relative to the known ground truth in the IMDB dataset. Findings indicate that psycholinguistic features - especially affect, tone, and use of adjectives - explain why the tools disagree. Engineers are urged caution when implementing SA tools for applications, as the tool selection affects the obtained sentiment labels.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. Moloud Abdar , Farhad Pourpanah , Sadiq Hussain , Dana Rezazadegan , Li Liu , Mohammad Ghavamzadeh , Paul Fieguth , Xiaochun Cao , Abbas Khosravi , and U. Rajendra Acharya . 2021. A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges. (2021) . Publisher : Elsevier . Moloud Abdar, Farhad Pourpanah, Sadiq Hussain, Dana Rezazadegan, Li Liu, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Paul Fieguth, Xiaochun Cao, Abbas Khosravi, and U. Rajendra Acharya. 2021. A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges. (2021). Publisher: Elsevier.

2. AWATIF: A Multi-Genre Corpus for Modern Standard Arabic Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis;Abdul-Mageed Muhammad;LREC,2012

3. Kholoud Khalil Aldous , Jisun An , and Bernard J Jansen . 2019 . View, Like, Comment, Post: Analyzing User Engagement by Topic at 4 Levels Across 5 Social Media Platforms for 53 News Organizations . In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Kholoud Khalil Aldous, Jisun An, and Bernard J Jansen. 2019. View, Like, Comment, Post: Analyzing User Engagement by Topic at 4 Levels Across 5 Social Media Platforms for 53 News Organizations. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

4. Approaches, tools and applications for sentiment analysis implementation;Alessia D.;International Journal of Computer Applications,2015

5. Debugging a Crowdsourced Task with Low Inter-Rater Agreement

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cross-modal fine-grained alignment and fusion network for multimodal aspect-based sentiment analysis;Information Processing & Management;2023-11

2. Handwriting Analysis on the Diaries of Rosamond Jacob;20th International Conference on Content-based Multimedia Indexing;2023-09-20

3. Social Media Analytics;Understanding Audiences, Customers, and Users via Analytics;2023-09-06

4. The Foundations of Social Media Analytics;Understanding Audiences, Customers, and Users via Analytics;2023-09-06

5. A Discussion of the Validity of Data Analytics;Understanding Audiences, Customers, and Users via Analytics;2023-09-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3