Methods and limitations of security policy reconciliation

Author:

McDaniel Patrick1,Prakash Atul2

Affiliation:

1. Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

2. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Abstract

A security policy specifies session participant requirements. However, existing frameworks provide limited facilities for the automated reconciliation of participant policies. This paper considers the limits and methods of reconciliation in a general-purpose policy model. We identify an algorithm for efficient two-policy reconciliation and show that, in the worst-case, reconciliation of three or more policies is intractable. Further, we suggest efficient heuristics for the detection and resolution of intractable reconciliation. Based upon the policy model, we describe the design and implementation of the Ismene policy language. The expressiveness of Ismene, and indirectly of our model, is demonstrated through the representation and exposition of policies supported by existing policy languages. We conclude with brief notes on the integration and enforcement of Ismene policy within the Antigone communication system.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Computer Science

Reference45 articles.

1. Bellovin S. November 1999. Distributed Firewalls. USENIX ;login: 39--47.]] Bellovin S. November 1999. Distributed Firewalls. USENIX ;login: 39--47.]]

2. Coyote

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Secure Cloud Storage with a Sanitizable Access Control System Again Malicious Data Publisher;INTI Journal;2024-08

2. A Method of Conflict Detection for Cooperative Defense Strategy in Power Industrial Control System;2020 Eighth International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD);2020-12

3. Methods and Tools for Policy Analysis;ACM Computing Surveys;2019-11-30

4. Elastic Trust Model for Dynamically Evolving Trust Frameworks;IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems;2019-09-01

5. Curie;Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy;2019-03-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3