Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering

Published:2023-10-05 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0360-0300
Container-title:ACM Computing Surveys
language:en
Short-container-title:ACM Comput. Surv.

Author:

Lu Qinghua¹,Zhu Liming¹,Xu Xiwei¹,Whittle Jon¹,Zowghi Didar¹,Jacquet Aurelie¹

Affiliation:

1. Data61, CSIRO, Australia

Abstract

Responsible AI is widely considered as one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time and is key to increase the adoption of AI. Recently, a number of AI ethics principles frameworks have been published. However, without further guidance on best practices, practitioners are left with nothing much beyond truisms. Also, significant efforts have been placed at algorithm-level rather than system-level, mainly focusing on a subset of mathematics-amenable ethical principles, such as fairness. Nevertheless, ethical issues can arise at any step of the development lifecycle, cutting across many AI and non-AI components of systems beyond AI algorithms and models. To operationalize responsible AI from a system perspective, in this paper, we present a Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR). Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the entire governance and engineering lifecycle. The Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue classifies the patterns into three groups: multi-level governance patterns, trustworthy process patterns, and responsible-AI-by-design product patterns. These patterns provide systematic and actionable guidance for stakeholders to implement responsible AI.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3626234

Reference131 articles.

1. David Adkins , Bilal Alsallakh , Adeel Cheema , Narine Kokhlikyan , Emily McReynolds , Pushkar Mishra , Chavez Procope , Jeremy Sawruk , Erin Wang , and Polina Zvyagina . 2022 . Method Cards for Prescriptive Machine-Learning Transparency. In 2022 IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on AI Engineering–Software Engineering for AI (CAIN). IEEE, 90–100 . David Adkins, Bilal Alsallakh, Adeel Cheema, Narine Kokhlikyan, Emily McReynolds, Pushkar Mishra, Chavez Procope, Jeremy Sawruk, Erin Wang, and Polina Zvyagina. 2022. Method Cards for Prescriptive Machine-Learning Transparency. In 2022 IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on AI Engineering–Software Engineering for AI (CAIN). IEEE, 90–100.

2. Prescriptive and Descriptive Approaches to Machine-Learning Transparency

3. Black box fairness testing of machine learning models

4. Mohit Kumar Ahuja Mohamed-Bachir Belaid Pierre Bernabé Mathieu Collet Arnaud Gotlieb Chhagan Lal Dusica Marijan Sagar Sen Aizaz Sharif and Helge Spieker. 2020. Opening the software engineering toolbox for the assessment of trustworthy AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07768(2020). Mohit Kumar Ahuja Mohamed-Bachir Belaid Pierre Bernabé Mathieu Collet Arnaud Gotlieb Chhagan Lal Dusica Marijan Sagar Sen Aizaz Sharif and Helge Spieker. 2020. Opening the software engineering toolbox for the assessment of trustworthy AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07768(2020).

5. Sulaiman Alsheiabni Yen Cheung and Chris Messom. 2019. Towards an artificial intelligence maturity model: from science fiction to business facts. (2019). Sulaiman Alsheiabni Yen Cheung and Chris Messom. 2019. Towards an artificial intelligence maturity model: from science fiction to business facts. (2019).