Developing an AI-based Explainable Expert Support System for Art Therapy

Author:

Kim Jiwon1ORCID,Kang Jiwon1ORCID,Yang Migyeong1ORCID,Park Chaehee1ORCID,Kim Taeeun2ORCID,Song Hayeon1ORCID,Han Jinyoung1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea

2. CHA University, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Sketch-based drawing assessments in art therapy are widely used to understand individuals’ cognitive and psychological states, such as cognitive impairments or mental disorders. Along with self-reported measures based on questionnaires, psychological drawing assessments can augment information regarding an individual’s psychological state. Interpreting drawing assessments demands significant time and effort, particularly for large groups such as schools or companies, and relies on the expertise of art therapists. To address this issue, we propose an artificial intelligence (AI)-based expert support system called AlphaDAPR to support art therapists and psychologists in conducting large-scale automatic drawing assessments. In Study 1, we first investigated user experience in AlphaDAPR . Through surveys involving 64 art therapists, we observed a substantial willingness (64.06% of participants) in using the proposed system. Structural equation modeling highlighted the pivotal role of explainable AI in the interface design, affecting perceived usefulness, trust, satisfaction, and intention to use. However, our interviews unveiled a nuanced perspective: while many art therapists showed a strong inclination to use the proposed system, they also voiced concerns about potential AI limitations and risks. Since most concerns arose from insufficient trust, which was the focal point of our attention, we conducted Study 2 with the aim of enhancing trust. Study 2 delved deeper into the necessity of clear communication regarding the division of roles between AI and users for elevating trust. Through experimentation with another 26 art therapists, we demonstrated that clear communication enhances users’ trust in our system. Our work not only highlights the potential of AlphaDAPR to streamline drawing assessments but also underscores broader implications for human-AI collaboration in psychological domains. By addressing concerns and optimizing communication, we pave the way for a symbiotic relationship between AI and human expertise, ultimately enhancing the efficacy and accessibility of psychological assessment tools.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference62 articles.

1. Ashraf Abdul, Jo Vermeulen, Danding Wang, Brian Y Lim, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2018. Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems: An hci research agenda. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–18.

2. Lewis Aiken. 1999. Personality assessment: Methods & practices (3rd ed. rev.). (1999).

3. Brian Allen and Chriscelyn Tussey. 2012. Can projective drawings detect if a child experienced sexual or physical abuse? A systematic review of the controlled research. Trauma, violence, & abuse 13, 2 (2012), 97–111.

4. Yasmeen Alufaisan, Laura R Marusich, Jonathan Z Bakdash, Yan Zhou, and Murat Kantarcioglu. 2021. Does explainable artificial intelligence improve human decision-making?. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 6618–6626.

5. Galit Amir and Rachel Lev-Wiesel. 2007. Dissociation as depicted in the traumatic event drawings of child sexual abuse survivors: A preliminary study. The arts in psychotherapy 34, 2 (2007), 114–123.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3