Cleaning Up Confounding: Accounting for Endogeneity Using Instrumental Variables and Two-Stage Models

Author:

Graf-Vlachy Lorenz1ORCID,Wagner Stefan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. TU Dortmund University, Germany and University of Stuttgart, Institute of Software Engineering, Germany

2. Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Germany

Abstract

Studies in empirical software engineering are often most useful if they make causal claims because this allows practitioners to identify how they can purposefully influence (rather than only predict) outcomes of interest. Unfortunately, many non-experimental studies suffer from potential endogeneity, for example through omitted confounding variables, which precludes claims of causality. In this conceptual tutorial, we aim to transfer the proven solution of instrumental variables and two-stage models as a means to account for endogeneity from econometrics to the field of empirical software engineering. To this end, we discuss causality and causal inference, provide a definition of endogeneity, explain its causes, and lay out the conceptual idea behind instrumental variable approaches and two-stage models. We also provide an extensive illustration with simulated data and a brief illustration with real data to demonstrate the approach, offering Stata and R code to allow researchers to replicate our analyses and apply the techniques to their own research projects. We close with concrete recommendations and a guide for researchers on how to deal with endogeneity.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference102 articles.

1. Bug fix-time prediction model using naïve Bayes classifier

2. Software Effort, Quality, and Cycle Time: A Study of CMM Level 5 Projects

3. Lifetime Earnings and the Vietnam Era Draft Lottery: Evidence from Social Security Administrative Records;Angrist Joshua D.;The American Economic Review,1990

4. Joshua David Angrist and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.

5. On making causal claims: A review and recommendations

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3