Topic Difficulty: Collection and Query Formulation Effects

Author:

Culpepper J. Shane1ORCID,Faggioli Guglielmo2ORCID,Ferro Nicola2ORCID,Kurland Oren3

Affiliation:

1. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

2. University of Padua, Padova, Italy

3. Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa, Israel

Abstract

Several recent studies have explored the interaction effects between topics, systems, corpora, and components when measuring retrieval effectiveness. However, all of these previous studies assume that a topic or information need is represented by a single query. In reality, users routinely reformulate queries to satisfy an information need. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the notion of “query variations” which are essentially multiple user formulations for an information need. Like many retrieval models, some queries are highly effective while others are not. This is often an artifact of the collection being searched which might be more or less sensitive to word choice. Users rarely have perfect knowledge about the underlying collection, and so finding queries that work is often a trial-and-error process. In this work, we explore the fundamental problem of system interaction effects between collections, ranking models, and queries. To answer this important question, we formalize the analysis using ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA) models to measure multiple components effects across collections and topics by nesting multiple query variations within each topic. Our findings show that query formulations have a comparable effect size of the topic factor itself, which is known to be the factor with the greatest effect size in prior ANOVA studies. Both topic and formulation have a substantially larger effect size than any other factor, including the ranking algorithms and, surprisingly, even query expansion. This finding reinforces the importance of further research in understanding the role of query rewriting in IR related tasks.

Funder

“DAta BenchmarK for Keyword-based Access and Retrieval”

University of Padova Strategic Research Infrastructure

Australian Research Council

Israel Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems

Reference83 articles.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Explainability for Transparent Conversational Information-Seeking;Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval;2024-07-10

2. Query Obfuscation for Information Retrieval Through Differential Privacy;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024

3. Reliable Information Retrieval Systems Performance Evaluation: A Review;IEEE Access;2024

4. Multi-objective genetic programming strategies for topic-based search with a focus on diversity and global recall;PeerJ Computer Science;2023-11-30

5. V-SBERT: A Mixture Model for Closed-Domain Question-Answering Systems Based on Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning;2023 6th International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology (DSIT);2023-07-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3