A Survey of Tool-supported Assurance Case Assessment Techniques

Author:

Maksimov Mike1ORCID,Kokaly Sahar1,Chechik Marsha1

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON , Canada

Abstract

Systems deployed in regulated safety-critical domains (e.g., the medical, nuclear, and automotive domains) are often required to undergo a stringent safety assessment procedure, as prescribed by a certification body, to demonstrate their compliance to one or more certification standards. Assurance cases are an emerging way of communicating safety, security, and dependability, as well as other properties of safety-critical systems in a structured and comprehensive manner. The significant size and complexity of these documents, however, makes the process of evaluating and assessing their validity a non-trivial task and an active area of research. Due to this, efforts have been made to develop and utilize software tools for the purpose of aiding developers and third party assessors in the act of assessing and analyzing assurance cases. This article presents a survey of the various assurance case assessment features contained in 10 assurance case software tools, all of which identified and selected by us via a previously conducted systematic literature review. We describe the various assessment techniques implemented, discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and identify possible areas in need of further research.

Funder

General Motors and NSERC Canada

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference40 articles.

1. {n.d.}. Agda wiki page. http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/pmwiki.php. {n.d.}. Agda wiki page. http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/pmwiki.php.

2. 2008. AFI RVSM PRE-IMPLEMENTATION SAFETY CASE. Retrieved from: https://www.icao.int/ESAF/Documents/RVSM/AFI_RVSM_PISC_Core_Document_FEB2008.pdf. 2008. AFI RVSM PRE-IMPLEMENTATION SAFETY CASE. Retrieved from: https://www.icao.int/ESAF/Documents/RVSM/AFI_RVSM_PISC_Core_Document_FEB2008.pdf.

3. 2010. AFI RVSM Post-Implementation Safety Case. Retrieved from: goo.gl/wD64FT. 2010. AFI RVSM Post-Implementation Safety Case. Retrieved from: goo.gl/wD64FT.

4. 2011. Preliminary Safety Case for an ADS-B Airport Surface Surveillance Application. Retrieved from: goo.gl/2VMJzu. 2011. Preliminary Safety Case for an ADS-B Airport Surface Surveillance Application. Retrieved from: goo.gl/2VMJzu.

5. RTCA/DO-178C: Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification (RTCA'11). Retrieved from: https://my.rtca.org/NC__Product?id=a1B36000001IcmqEAC. RTCA/DO-178C: Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification (RTCA'11). Retrieved from: https://my.rtca.org/NC__Product?id=a1B36000001IcmqEAC.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3