Describing the What and Why of Students’ Difficulties in Boolean Logic

Author:

Herman Geoffrey L.1,Loui Michael C.1,Kaczmarczyk Lisa2,Zilles Craig1

Affiliation:

1. University of Illinois at Urbana--Champaign

2. Educational Researcher and Consultant

Abstract

The ability to reason with formal logic is a foundational skill for computer scientists and computer engineers that scaffolds the abilities to design, debug, and optimize. By interviewing students about their understanding of propositional logic and their ability to translate from English specifications to Boolean expressions, we characterized common misconceptions and novice problem-solving processes of students who had recently completed a digital logic design class. We present these results and discuss their implications for instruction and the development of pedagogical assessment tools known as concept inventories.

Funder

Division of Undergraduate Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Education,General Computer Science

Reference71 articles.

1. Almstrum V. L. 1993. Limitations in the understanding of mathematical logic by novice computer science students. Ph.D. thesis University of Texas at Austin. Almstrum V. L. 1993. Limitations in the understanding of mathematical logic by novice computer science students. Ph.D. thesis University of Texas at Austin.

2. Almstrum V. L. 1996. Investigating student difficulties with mathematical logic. In Teaching and Learning Formal Methods C. N. Dean and M. G. Hinchey Eds. Academic Press 131--160. Almstrum V. L. 1996. Investigating student difficulties with mathematical logic. In Teaching and Learning Formal Methods C. N. Dean and M. G. Hinchey Eds. Academic Press 131--160.

3. Concept inventories in computer science for the topic discrete mathematics

4. Anderson J. R. Reder L. M. and Simon H. A. 1998. Radical constructivism and cognitive psychology. In Brookings Papers on Education Policy D. Ravitch Ed. Brookings Institution 227--255. (A more complete version is available online http://act.psy.cmu.edu/ACT/papers/misapplied-abs-ja.html.) Anderson J. R. Reder L. M. and Simon H. A. 1998. Radical constructivism and cognitive psychology. In Brookings Papers on Education Policy D. Ravitch Ed. Brookings Institution 227--255. (A more complete version is available online http://act.psy.cmu.edu/ACT/papers/misapplied-abs-ja.html.)

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Taking Stock of Concept Inventories in Computing Education: A Systematic Literature Review;Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1;2023-08-07

2. Discovering and Quantifying Misconceptions in Formal Methods Using Intelligent Tutoring Systems;Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1;2023-03-02

3. Effects of programming tools with different degrees of embodiment on learning Boolean operations;Education and Information Technologies;2022-01-05

4. Developing Behavioral Concepts of Higher-Order Functions;Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research;2021-08-16

5. Algorithmic Detection of Boolean Logic Errors in Clinical Decision Support Statements;Applied Clinical Informatics;2021-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3