A quality and popularity based ranking method for research datasets-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A quality and popularity based ranking method for research datasets

Published:2022-01-14 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:2022 4th Asia Pacific Information Technology Conference
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Koya Kushwanth¹,Chowdhury Gobinda²

Affiliation:

1. iSchool,Department of Finance,Accounting and Business Systems,College of Business,Technology and Engineering, Sheffield Hallam University, UK

2. iSchool,Department of Computer and Information Sciences,Faculty of Science, University of Strathclyde, UK

Publisher

ACM

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3512353.3512368

Reference34 articles.

1. Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs

2. The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

3. Lutz Bornmann Rüdiger Mutz Christoph Neuhaus and Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2008. "Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results." Ethics in science and environmental politics 8 no. 1: 93-102. Lutz Bornmann Rüdiger Mutz Christoph Neuhaus and Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2008. "Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results." Ethics in science and environmental politics 8 no. 1: 93-102.

4. The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review

5. Giovanni Abramo , Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, and Flavia Di Costa . 2011 . "National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings." Scientometrics 89, no. 3: 929-941. Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, and Flavia Di Costa. 2011. "National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings." Scientometrics 89, no. 3: 929-941.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Aesthetic Experience and Popularity Ratings for Controversial and Non-Controversial Artworks Using Machine Learning Ranking;Applied Sciences;2023-09-26